top of page

Phenomics - the great missing omics

  • Michael Florea
  • Feb 12
  • 2 min read

Updated: 6 days ago

There is a major, gaping hole at the center of biology.



Molecular biology has been digitized. You can get terabytes of standardized, high quality data from a single genomics/transcriptomics/proteomics run.



But, what we ultimately care about is not the molecules - but the impact the molecular change had on the functioning of the whole organism.



Yet when it comes to measuring health & phenotypes, the state of the art is manual, sometimes semiquantitative measurements with data written in paper notebooks.



It’s a 10,000x disparity in generating data from molecules vs whole organisms - even in the most advanced labs in the world.



There isn’t even a commonly used word for “large-scale, standardized, organism-scale phenotypic data generation”.



That’s insane. And it’s a major contributor to why translation fails so often.



In short, “Phenomics” is a great missing omics.



So - building a “phenomics” device was our first goal at Olden. 



That meant:


1. Solving the multi-animal tracking problem - maintaining correct IDs accurately, over long periods of time in complex environments.


2. Miniaturizing the hardware 


3. Achieving a low cost point that would beat manual analysis.



The first stage of the work is now complete and published, here.  



Key results:


-Tech: Smart Lids - phenomics devices that continuously monitor all animals in their cage, gathering data on health & behavior 10 times per second, 24/7.


-Data: 21 metrics across activity, motion, eating, drinking, fighting, rearing, climbing, sleeping, social behaviors and positioning. 


-Segmentation accuracy: 99.5% concordance with human


-Multi-animal tracking accuracy: 97% average (even at 5 mice)


-Metrics precision: 82-99% (some room for improvement but achieved at very low computational cost)


-Robustness: works in messy, real-world scenarios, robust across occlusions, coat colors, jumps, different lighting, beddings, nesting materials, enrichments and 5 major cage types



There is room for growth: improving precision for certain metrics, expanding to new cage types and species, and adding contact-based metrics like weight and cognition.



But - the key is - the system wasn’t built for an academic publication, but to be an accessible, everyday tool from day 1.



We now have hundreds of scientists across 5 continents using the tech, making discoveries daily. The first of our users’ papers will be out soon.



So - if you have a friend or colleague doing animal research, send them this.


 
 
bottom of page